A story in the Sunday Times today suggests that 2 out of 5 students who sat essay based subjects at A level may receive the wrong results on Thursday. It says:
The study shows the probability of a candidate not getting the correct grade in subjects such as English and history is between 42% and 48% because examiners mark subjectively. For sociology it is 37% and for geography 35%.
To be honest, and I write as someone who spent many years as an A level examiner and then as an assistant senior examiner of essay-based sociology, such subjects are difficult to mark as they are qualitative. If they readily fit the mark scheme, that’s fine, but anything slightly different requires greater examiner skill. However, unless things have changed tremendously since then, huge amounts of work was put into moderating marking, and remarking prior to results being issued, so hopefully students can feel reassured.
Today’s Sunday Times (11 August 2019) contains an article about A level grades that fundamentally misrepresents research conducted by Ofqual. Our report that is cited is not a commentary about whether grades awarded to students are ‘right’ or ‘wrong’. Rather, it considers the implications of there not being a single right mark for every answer given in every subject, particularly those involving essay writing. This is not new, the issue has existed as long as qualifications have been marked and graded. On that basis, more than one grade could well be a legitimate reflection of a student’s performance and they would both be a sound estimate of that student’s ability at that point in time based on the available evidence from the assessment they have undertaken.
We take the quality of marking of GCSEs, AS and A levels very seriously. It is recognised that the quality of marking in England is amongst the best in the world. However, we are not complacent and we are committed to working with others in the sector to make marking in every subject the very best it can be. Students, schools and colleges can be assured that the A level results that are awarded are an accurate reflection of their work over the past two years. And if there are instances of marking errors, these can and should be corrected through the normal review process. Universities, employers and others who rely on these qualifications can be confident that this week’s results will provide a fair assessment of a student’s knowledge and skills.